Telford & Wrekin Council Watch

Analog Clock2
Paypal Donate
Thankyou ALL for your valued support.
j7TitleScroller
Simple Page Options
Add Site to Favorites
Add Page to Favorites
Make Homepage
Print Page
Donations

Secure Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Personal Messages

You are not logged in.

Surveys List
Main Menu
Home
Forums
Tell a Friend about TCW
Telford & Wrekin In Pictures
TCW VIDEO NEWS
News
Contact Us
Search
Links
News Feeds
FAQs
TCW ONLINE STORE
Play Games
Community Builder
TCW Yello Pages
Calender
TCW Gallery
RSS
Whos Online
No Users Online
Tab News Module
Follow telfordcouncilw on Twitter

SponsoredTweets referral badge
Substandard Education PDF Print E-mail
Tag it:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Subjoin
User Rating: / 3
PoorBest 
Written by johnfranklyn   
Tuesday, 27 January 2009

 

Education In Telford and Wrekin
 
We’ve read many times about the exclusion of pupils from school, their behaviour, but how much fault actually lies with the school? This must be considered as the education authority all too often points the accusing finger at children and their families.
 
Lets have a look at the Sutherland Business and Enterprise College, once known as the Sutherland School, previously known as The John hunt.
 
A School that has had continuous poor teaching and attainment levels and has adopted a regular change of name to paper over the cracks that regularly appear for all to see.
 
Every School in the borough has a log facility, this log facility enables Teachers to make covert entries onto a secret log about a child. It has recently been discovered, by using the FOI to gain such logs, that the great majority of entries are inaccurate and say remarks such as
 
Bully
Truant
 
But do not offer any other explanation.
 
In one recent incident a log entry was made onto a childs log saying
 
“Two dinner ladies made a complaint x and her attitude towards them”
 
The truth is
 
“The family made a complaint about the dinner ladies, an internal investigation was completed, one of the dinner ladies admitted threatening to get the pupil after school”
 
The childs log entry was never corrected and the dinner lady was allowed to keep her job, despite admitting threatening behaviour.
 
These log entries are available for all staff to read as they travel from school to school and as so many  contain incorrect entries, teachers are making a judgement about a child on defective information.
 
One local family has now challenged the school and its log keeping with a series of 26 questions that have pointed out faults in the record keeping.
 
The LEA has no policy on these entries as the majority of schools make up their own rules locally as Head Teachers are autonomous.
 
This autonomy leads to a fragmented standard of education throughout the Borough.
 
Another fault lies in the Governors. The Sutherland has a parent who is on the disciplinary panel, despite this governor having a child who is disruptive at school and this governor cannot control his own child, should he be in a position where he decides the future of other children?
 
It is well known that the Sutherland is to be bulldozed at some future point, yet thousands of pounds are now being spent on a new building. This building is nothing more than an exclusion unit.
 
Children sent into the unit will take part in a programme called The John Hunt programme. Although this is now part of school policy,
 
Parents have not been informed about the introduction of The John Hunt Programme. They have not been informed what the programme consists off and what criteria is used for placing a child into this punishment block.
 
Bullying of pupils, by staff in this school is rife.
 
Teachers select their favourites and gossip about parents in the staff room with alarming regularity This gossip is often overheard by other children and visitors to the school.
 
The school is unable to cater adequately for a childs special needs and things like counselling and anger management are often promised, agreed as a need, but very rarely delivered in such a manner that it assists the relevant children.  
 
The LEA, offers no guidance and has no policy on the use of ABC contracts, which can be used as an effective tool to correct a childs behaviour, but can be introduced at anytime, by pretty much any teacher. This undermines the effectiveness of such a contract and they can be used against a pupil at any point.
 
The borough, within its education, is ineffective at actioning bullying, often moving the victim without taking action against the bully, even when the bully is a teacher.
 
The Sutherland School has inbuilt problems, some of which have been indentified over the years in ofsted reports. Things like communication with parents and the involvement of parents in the decision making process of their childs education has never been a priority.
 
Now, this school wants to seek Foundation Status and Charitable Status, yet the school is failing in so many ways.
 
Before the School seeks another change of status, it needs to invest in teachers that want to teach all children and actually communicate with parents. This communication process is vital, especially when a child could find themselves in a exclusion unit when the school has no clear guidelines about how it is used or when a child is placed in it.
Example:-
 
1.A child well known for fighting at school, has a fight and is allowed to carry on with their usual education after a one day exclusion.
 
2, A child with no history of fighting has a fight, this child was excluded for a week, placed on the John Hunt programme for a further two weeks and reported to the police.
 
This is an example of how punishments, for a similar offence receive alarmingly different punishments and the punishment given seems to depend on whether the child and  or the family happens to be in favour with the staff.
 
These are issues that destroy a childs education, allow problems to overspill into community life and is an example of how fragmented the approach to education is in the Borough.
 
Head Teachers are often out seeking funding from businesses, which leaves the school as a rudderless ship.  
 
The sad fact is, our children are offered little protection and even the childrens act in an ineffective tool, yet the staff are given considerable protection by employment law, regardless of how bad they perform.
 
Schools need to raise their performance, no continually change their name.
 
I advise every parent to get a copy of their childs log from the school using the FOI. If the school resists, which they will, I will gladly take them through the process.
Comments
Search RSS
Only registered users can write comments!

3.20 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."




Telford Council Watch
Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Netscape!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Wists!Newsvine!Furl!Blogmarks!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
 
< Prev   Next >