Telford & Wrekin Council Watch - Blog
www.mamboteam.com
Telford & Wrekin Council Watch  
Home arrow Blog
Monday, 08 September 2008
 
 
StumbleUpon
Personal Messages

You are not logged in.

Donations

Enter Amount:

Surveys List
Main Menu
Home
TCW Petitions
Forums
Tell a Friend about TCW
Telford & Wrekin In Pictures
TCW VIDEO NEWS
News
Blog
Contact Us
Search
Links
News Feeds
FAQs
Wrapper
Mamblog
Play Games
Community Builder
TCW Yello Pages
Whos Online
No Users Online
Login
Latest News
Newsflash
A blog of all sections with no images
The Great Leisure Centre Rip Off PDF Print E-mail
Tag it:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Subjoin
User Rating: / 0
Written by John Franklyn   
Tuesday, 13 May 2008

Telford and Wrekin Council are announcing new and exciting improvements to the leisure facilities in Oakengates, Wellington and Madeley and are doing so proudly.
 
Whilst the leisure centres are busy signing up new memberships for use of the gym, they forget to tell them at the point of sale that each leisure facility will be closed for a period of a week at the point of sale.
 
Instead, they are sending out letters to each member and expecting each member to use one of the other facilities, fine, but you join to use the facility at Oakengates and you should not be expected to travel to Madeley or Wellington.
 
What Telford and Wrekin Council do not have, is a refund policy for time of closure but are expected to take each persons money for that week of closure.
 
Oakengates will be closed from 27th May 2008 – 3rd June 2008-05-13
Wellington will be closed from 9th June – 16th June 2008-05-13
Madeley will be closed from 23rd June – 30th June 2008
 
If these three Leisure centres have 10,000 members between them, it is estimated that the Council will receive £35,000 for a service they are not actually providing.
 
This is where the Trading Standards should now be talking with Ron Odunaiya Corporate Director Community Services and Cllr Denis Allen for not having the relevant policy, practice or procedure in place in the fact that the Leisure facilities are not informing new members at the point of sale about the planned closures and do not have a refund policy.
 
Telford and Wrekin Council are ripping enough from the pockets of residents without adding insult to injury.
 
I urge all members to stand up and say enough is enough and ask for the weeks refund.
 
Each member will receive a minimum of £3.50, but it is £3.50 the Council are not entitled to, should not be holding back especially when they have failed to implement correct policy.

 

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 14 May 2008 )
 
Telford and Wrekin FOR SALE PDF Print E-mail
Tag it:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Subjoin
User Rating: / 0
Written by John Franklyn   
Saturday, 10 May 2008

Telford and Wrekin Council has recently seen a large number of Council Assets go to auction in Haydock raising over £1,000,000 in the sales
 
There was some considerable lack of communication with elected members and members of the public had no idea these sales were going ahead.
 
The public are only the tax payer and pay for all these pieces of land, there up keep etc, so why should they be kept in the loop?
 
The topic of the “Eade Bay Auctions” was discussed at some lengths at the following link
 
 
 
In this topic it became very clear that the people we elected to represent us were not involved or informed of the decision to sell Council Assets effectively owned by the residents of the borough.
 
The proof that elected members were not informed about sales was proven beyond any doubt in a confession wrote by Steve Wellings in an email sent out to Councillors and the following was said by Steve Wellings,
 
 
 
Quote Chief Executive Steve Wellings

“Firstly, I would like to apologise unreservedly for the fact that we did not let you know in advance about the schedule of assets we were putting up for sale. In our haste to try to arrange the best situation from an asset management and financial view (both laudable aims I am sure you would agree) the sequencing of involving you went awry.”
 
 
There were a number of questions asked about the Sale of assets and the fact that the proceeds are to used by the Council when they eventually apply for lottery funding to alter the Town Park and again raise further funds by selling off large parts of the Town Park.
 
I and others firmly believe that its is not only in the public interest to know what the Council is doing or intends to do with assets that we ultimately pay for but we have a right to know especially when the Chif Executive was so inept in the handling of the last “Eade Bay Auctions”
 
Lets now take a trip back to February 2007 in which Andrew Eade promised us all
 
“an open and honest Council”
 
“Working With us hand in glove”
 
“Owning up to mistakes that have been made”
 
 
I for one am still waiting for this to happen 12 months later.
 
 
The recent debacle with regards the land sales should be of great concern to us all. Telford and Wrekin Council do have an area on their web site that has been allocated to the listing of Council Assets for sale, but this has not been updated or used in several years.
 
It is possible and highly likely that the council own assets being used by community groups, voluntary services and local business which could and probably are listed for sale.
 
With all this in mind, I believe it is in the public interest for them to know what council assets are owned, which have been sold, which assets have been highlighted for sale and the plans are with others, the Council last provided this info some two years ago.
 
I phoned the property department and asked for the info of what Council assets are listed for sale and which have been sold, they declined to provide this information, its not on the web site or in any public forum, so I submitted an FOI.
 
Today I have received a reply from Alan Fox – Asset & Property Manager (Estates & Investments)
 
Saying
 
“It is possible that disclosing the information may not be in the public interest.
 
I say
 
We pay as Residents
We use these assets as residents
Clubs, Groups, Voluntary Organisations rely on these assets
Businesses run and employ residents in these assets
 
Bearing in mind the cock up made by Steve Wellings Chief Executive
 
It is in our Interest to know what they are doing and what they intend to do.
 
 
 
I now put this to Andrew Eade – are you now prepared to tell this officer to supply the information requested.
 
Are you prepared to start keeping your pre election promises and start being open and honest
 
Or are you
 
Going to keep the same old thing, the same old way because
 
“its always been done that way”
 
Will Andrew Eade be prepared to meet me and one or two others, face to face and the questions we have asked?
 
  
 
Share Holders and Business Opportunities PDF Print E-mail
Tag it:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Subjoin
User Rating: / 0
Written by John Franklyn   
Thursday, 08 May 2008

A Venue for Telford and Wrekin Council Watch Shares will be arranged this week and several issues will be up for discussion.
 
The following has already started and is in the early days as we speak.
 
As already discussed in other topics, Telford and Wrekin has the highest number of untrained 16-17 year olds in the West Midlands and it is not a record to be proud of.
 
We have to take into consideration that it is likely these untrained 16-17 years are likely to become untrained 18, 19 20 year olds. This of course reduces their individual chances of gaining meaningful employment and increase their individual chances of becoming involved in crime or even a victim of crime.
 
Telford and Wrekin has a wealth of young people that could benefit not only from some investment, but also from simply being given a second chance.
 
It is my proposal that young people are given the opportunity to set up in a business of their own and this is where Share Holders will have an increasing part to play and an increased say.
 
I am already in the early stages of discussing and arranging further support, discounts and sponsorships with some national companies to hopefully drive this project forward.
 
Telford First is already providing a variety of services, with gardening and basic property maintenance being among it most popular.
    
Offering a variety of services, incentives, Loyalty Bonuses and discounts the idea can be used to set up young people with their own business.
 
With a small investment, young people can be given formal training, access to equipment and set up in their own territorial business under the banner of and with the help of Telford First and TCW shareholders.
 
Investment in young people in an innovative way, more details will be discussed at the Share Sales Meeting. 
 
Question Mark Hangs over the Auditors Letter PDF Print E-mail
Tag it:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Subjoin
User Rating: / 0
Written by John Franklyn   
Wednesday, 07 May 2008

 

The Residents of Telford and Wrekin are being misled and I for one express my concern at the propaganda thrown out from the offices of Telford and Wrekin Council.
I for one find myself questioning the auditor and at least some of the contents in a recent auditors letter.
The following paragraph is an extract from the auditors letter, recently discussed at Full Council and reported quite widely but not entirely accurate and I wonder why something has gone through unchallenged.
I for one stand up and now challenge the validity of the following statement, which is not accurate and I believe it casts a shadow over the auditors role and their independence whilst displaying that many elected members will let reports go through if they look good.
 
With the creation of ‘Transforming Telford’ there has been a change in the way
that economic development and support is delivered. Figures from October 2006
until March 2007 show that in that period there have been three new investments,
seven business expansions, 361 jobs created and 100 jobs safeguarded, through
74 company visits and 118 supported enquiries. Unemployment levels in the
borough have remained below the West Midlands average (2.6 per cent in
March 2007 compared with 3.4 per cent in the West Midlands). The Council also
scores well above average in the delivery of the Local Transport Plan.
 
Questions have been asked and maybe now elected members would like to provide answers, I have asked the following
 
The statement above is from the Annual Audit Letter.  TT was then known as Telford First and had not moved into their offices until nearer December, they were not incorporated at Companies House until 29/06/2007 - are they taking credit for the figures provided and if so how did they do it? - How many jobs were lost over the same period and what is the purpose of Transforming Telford (Enterprises) Ltd which is a separate Ltd Company. 
The answers have been provided, but on this occasion I will not give the identity of the person who is in a very senior position, but it does confirm the fact that auditors have given praise to Transforming Telford for something they had nothing to do with
 
Dear John
 
Prior to the Transforming Telford's incorporation on 29 June 2007 the economic development service was delivered by employees of Telford and Wrekin Council. The figures you refer to in your email relate to those services provided to companies by the economic development team between October 2006 – March 2007. With regard to quantifying job losses, there is no obligation for individuals and companies to notify the relevant authorities unless it is deemed to be a ‘large scale redundancy’ involving 20 or more people. It is therefore not possible to say how many jobs were lost over the same time period. The government publishes an Annual Business Inquiry (ABI) which provides statistics including the total number of jobs in Telford and Wrekin’s economy. The 2007 data is due for publication on 17 December 2008.
 
 
This clearly says that Transforming Telford had nothing to do with any success highlighted in the auditors letter, but it certainly let residents believe they delivered this success.
Not only did local tax payers fund £1.3 million for a Limited Company, but the tax payer could have also footed the bill for a second Limited Company and both set up by Telford and Wrekin Council.
TRANSFORMING TELFORD (ENTERPRISES) LIMITED
LEGAL SERVICES, BOROUGH OF
TELFORD, & WREKIN CIVIC OFFICES
MALINSLEE
TELFORDTF3 4LF
Company No. 05992794
Was also set up covertly and the same source has also confirmed
Transforming Telford (Enterprises) Ltd was incorporated on 8 November 2006 under the name of Transforming Telford Ltd. It has never traded and is in the process of being dissolved with Companies House.
 
 
If the Economic Development Team performed so well, why did Telford and Wrekin tax payers fund the setting up of TWO Limited Companies only to see one of those companies dissolved.
 
Again, concern must be expressed as it was set up covertly and attempts were made to close it down without telling the tax payer.
 
We have escaped over 30 years of secrets with one administration to find the other is not far off the same.
 
We have been promised openness, honesty and working “Hand in Glove” – its been said, when is it going to happen.
 
I have forwarded the open letter to the Leader, I still await answers and will be following up to get them.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sutton Hill Revisited PDF Print E-mail
Tag it:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Subjoin
User Rating: / 0
Written by John Franklyn   
Tuesday, 06 May 2008

                  

I was asked to go back to Sutton Hill for a brew and a walk round. I was my intention not to do any more in depth on this topic, but it makes sense just to follow up.
 
I was nice to wander around with a couple of residents and have a look at the Summer Hill area.
 
This area featured quite a lot in videos and Midlands Today and looked quite gloomy.
 
We had a stroll around and whilst the sun shinning had a positive impact, the fact that a clean up has occurred not only made the area look better and the cosmetic impact is obvious, but the impact that cannot be seen was felt, the feeling of safety has certainly started to return.
 
Its great to see something happening and steps being taken in the right direction.
 
Councillor Eric Carter said the Garage area would be clear in three months and I would suggest the clean up of the garage area was started and completed with in one month.
 
It is likely that lessons have been learnt from Sutton Hill and these lessons can only serve to benefit other areas as well.
 
The people I have spoken to today are feeling optimistic about the future of their estate and its great to see.

 

 
Dubious Petition PDF Print E-mail
Tag it:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Subjoin
User Rating: / 0
Written by John Franklyn   
Friday, 02 May 2008

 

Dubious Petition
 
Great Dawley Parish Council held one of its infamous meetings last night, Thursday May 1st.
 
Cllr Kuldip Sahota was elected as Chair with Parish Cllr Niki Holmes being elected as Vice Chair.
 
The meeting progressed through various points with the issue of the senior citizens Christmas Party being raised.
 
Kuldip Sahota said that
 
“Christmas Parties will be bigger and better, if 2100 Senior Citizens wanted to come to the Christmas Party they can and they will be accommodated”
 
Unfortunately Cllr Kuldip Sahota has made a promise that the budget of Great Dawley Parish Council cannot afford. A budget of £10,000 has been set which now leaves Cllr Kuldip Sahota with an approximate shortfall of over £27,000.
 
The issue of the Christmas party continued as it became clear that current proposals set by Cllr Kuldip sahota and his colleagues mean 82% of senior citizens in Dawley would infact be excluded from a Christmas Party.
 
 In a recent meeting, MP David Wright agreed that the TAWPA proposals of allocating money or vouchers to each Senior Citizen was in fact the best idea.
 
MP David Wright agreed that by allocating money to each Senior Citizen was the fairest method and ensured that each Senior Citizen benefitted equally and the fact that an additional £10,000 was available to spend on Dawley High Street, it would actually pump prime additional spending which would be of benefit to local business and the Community.
 
Unfortunately, MP David Wright used his get out of jail free card and quoted Chatham House rules which is a great tool in allowing MPs to lie.
 
Great Dawley Parish Council carried out a consultation but the method and wording of the questionnaire was not fully agreed, I have been around Dawley today speaking with a number of Senior Citizens who said they never received any consultation with regards the Christmas Party.
 
 
DUBIOUS
 
For sometime now TAWPA members have been trying to ensure fair play for all Senior Citizens in Dawley and MP David Wright agrees they have best overall proposal.
 
During the public session Borough Councillor Adrian Williams presented a Petition to Cllr Kuldip Sahota Chair of GDPC which had been signed by 420 Senior Citizens who agreed with fairness for all and that 82% should not be excluded from the Christmas Party. A number of the Senior Citizens also wrote about their own personal circumstances, some of these would bring a tear to your eyes.
 
After handing over the Petition Parish Cllr Shaun Davies said
 
“I consider that to be a dubious Petition”
 
This statement alone is not only an insult to the 420 Senior Citizens who signed and supported the petition, it is a slur on the efforts made by a registered political party and a slur on the Good Character of a Borough Councillor who also a Member of the Standards and Audit Committee.
 
I am informed that another complaint is being prepared to the Standard Board of England with regards the conduct of Parish Cllr Shaun Davies.  
 
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next > End >>

Results 21 - 30 of 76
 
Top! Top!