Telford & Wrekin Council Watch

Analog Clock2
Paypal Donate
Thankyou ALL for your valued support.
j7TitleScroller
Simple Page Options
Add Site to Favorites
Add Page to Favorites
Make Homepage
Print Page
Donations

Secure Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Personal Messages

You are not logged in.

Surveys List
Main Menu
Home
Forums
Tell a Friend about TCW
Telford & Wrekin In Pictures
TCW VIDEO NEWS
News
Contact Us
Search
Links
News Feeds
FAQs
TCW ONLINE STORE
Play Games
Community Builder
TCW Yello Pages
Calender
TCW Gallery
RSS
Whos Online
No Users Online
Tab News Module
Follow telfordcouncilw on Twitter

SponsoredTweets referral badge
Gamble for the Big boys - let the others struggle
Tag it:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Subjoin
User Rating: / 0
Written by johnfranklyn   
Wednesday, 08 October 2008

 

The Government are now to gamble away £50 billion to rescue banks after they went through decades of irresponsible lending and paying out huge bonuses to people who were nothing more than a bunch of commission hunters.
 
The phrase “Credit Crunch” is still being banded around, but it is not that, it is a recession or for others it is a “depression”.
 
Unemployment is set to hit 2,000,000, yet the only people who seem to think jobs are actually being created are the mass amount of quango’s this country has who continually churn out their propaganda.
 
David Cameron has said he knows the recession will be tough for some, but he’ll be ok, that’s because he has a guaranteed income from the tax payer. No matter how tough things become, tax will always have to be paid.
 
The Shropshire Star ran a story on 7th October 2008 under the headline
 
‘Crunch will bite for years to come’
 
You don’t need to be a financial wizard to know that. Yet the conservative administration saw fit to increase councillors allowances by around £132k. Then we have to endure the same old lines,
 
“We do miss out on overtime and promotion at work”
 
Which is the same old lame excuse to justify a certain few filling their pockets. They knew this could be the case before they ran for election, then chose to moan about monies not being available for their wards.
 
If the Administration were actually prudent with our money, stopped these ridiculous increases in allowances and stopped all these fat cats in the ivory tower from dipping into the pot, then maybe things would not be as hard.
 
The administration said the return of weekly waste cost was equivalent to a 2% council tax increase, then surely these increase in allowances are equivalent to at least 1% increase.
 
But what have we seen recently,
 
Assets sold at almost bargain basement prices in the now named “Eade Bay sales”
 
Local businesses had their properties sold from beneath them without any form of appeal process in a situation that was grossly mishandled.
 
As reported previously, a senior citizen who relies on a cleaner employed by the council has seen a 70% increase in his costs.
 
 
Carers have seen increased costs.
Monies removed from libraries.
Monies removed from homeless storage
Council tax increased
Charges for bulk waste collection
 
The people who can afford it the least are the people being hit the hardest and this is without the increase in petrol, gas, electricity etc.
 
Some Head Teachers are now going out cap in hand to businesses to get financial support, some of the new school builds are being delayed and the latest is, the regeneration of Woodside to come to a grinding halt half way through a job and these monies diverted to another part of Telford.
 
If there is an under spend in budgets, why can’t the remainder be used for community benefits?
 
Why can’t it be re-invested into
 
Youth Support
Education
Providing more teachers
Keeping the Council Tax down
Supporting Small Businesses
Supporting Carers and Senior Citizens
 
This approach could be considered “Prudent”
 
But in truth, we will see and hear more excuses as to why something cannot be done, rather than excuses as to why something can be done.
 
Banks and big business will be propped up by public money, whilst the small business, education and the struggling resident will be left to their own devices.
 
 
 
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 08 October 2008 )
 
Gagged
Tag it:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Subjoin
User Rating: / 0
Written by johnfranklyn   
Sunday, 05 October 2008

The saga of the Penguins continues and will continue for sometime yet.

 
After Telford and Wrekin Council reached world wide embarrassment and condemnation of its policy of checking lone adults in the Town Park, Rachel Whittaker and her colleagues who campaign on environmental issues, found themselves being banned from “Madeley Green Day”
 
The Campaigners turned up to Madeley Green Day after their invitation was retracted without any explanation. The Group attended the event and handed out leaflets raising the awareness about “Global Warming”, something you would expect to find at a Green Event.
 
The Campaigners wore gags and the signs pictured below.
 
 
 
Even though Cllr David Davies was quoted in the Shropshire Star as saying
 
“Things could have been done better”
 
He continued in the same old manner we have come to expect from a number of Councillors, whether Parish or Borough.
 
Cllr Davies confirmed
 
“I decided to retract the invitation which was a unilateral decision made for and on behalf 17 other Councillors”
 
Cllr Davies went onto say that
 
“the invitation was with drawn because it had not been discussed at Council”
 
It came to light moments after that non of the others attending the event had been discussed at Council either.
 
Cllr Davies said he new nothing about the issues revolving around The Town Park had had not read the Shropshire Star. He obviously never watched the news, listened to the radio, viewed the internet or read any of the national papers that covered the debacle either.
 
Clearly he spent several days living under a rock not listening to any current affairs.
 
It soon became apparent that Cllr Davies has an issue with Global Warming as he also wanted other signs about the issue removing from the event, although I would expect him to deny that, the signs he wanted removing are pictured below,
 
 
 
 
 
This is another issue that had nothing to do with policy, but it had more to do with stopping freedom of speech in yet another public area.
 
Whilst Cllr Davies was quoting some kind of procedure and rules, he quite conveniently ignored other rules that were broken, displaying an application of the rules as he saw fit to apply them.
 
As an elected member said
 
“this is what happens when people get onto the Council without actually being elected, then they choose to co-opt their friends onto the same Council”
 
“The people of Madeley need to do something to stop this kind of thing happening in the future”
 
A member of Madeley Parish Council has confirmed by email
 
“the decision to de-ivite Wrekin Stopwar was taken by Councillor David Davis not the council i as you know am not happy about it and intend to raise it at the next full council”
 
This makes it more than clear that Cllr Davies has not discussed the issue with any other member of the council, but as he said,
 
“It was a democratic decision”
 
Just who are you trying to kid Cllr Davies.
 
Wrekin Stop War soon gain considerable public support as members of the public asked for their leaflets and they made their point leaving so it would not spoil the day for others.
 
This is the kind of consideration others could certainly learn from.
Last Updated ( Monday, 06 October 2008 )
 
Green Day - But You're Banned
Tag it:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Subjoin
User Rating: / 0
Written by johnfranklyn   
Friday, 03 October 2008

                                 

 

                                  

Climate Change Activists Banned From Green Fair
 
Everybody will recall the Penguins in Telford Town park and how they were ejected from the area because they were handing out leaflets to raise the awareness about climate change.
 
What happened was beyond belief.
 
On the 21st August 2008 Telford and Wrekin Council issued a letter to Mr.John Evans clearly stating,
 
“Our Town Park Staff approach adults that are not associated with any children in the Town Park, and request the reason for them being there” 
 
This hidden policy led to wide spread condemnation of Telford and Wrekin Council, not only in the national press, blogs around the world, national children’s Charities but also the home office.
 
After much adverse publicity, Councillor Andrew Eade issued an apology, which was clearly a knee jerk reaction and timely as it was made in time for a press release about a Town Park Lottery application.
On the 12th September 2008, the following communication was sent to the leader of the Council,
 
 
 
12 September 2008
Councillor Andrew Eade
Telford & Wrekin Council
Civic Offices
Telford TF3 4WZ

Dear Councillor Eade
Telford Town Park and the Right to Protest
I refer to my letter to Denis Allen of 11 August 2008, written on behalf of the Wrekin Stop War collective and to which we are yet to receive a response. As we have learned in the last few days that several other correspondents and media outlets have received responses on the same issue, we wonder why those of us actually involved in the incident have not been extended the same courtesy?
As you are undoubtedly aware, myself and a fellow group member, Neil Donaldson, were asked to leave the Town Park after handing out leaflets about climate change whilst dressed as penguins. We were approached by three park wardens and advised that we would have to seek permission for our activities from the park management. We duly did this and were further advised that we were not allowed to undertake such activities without first undergoing a CRB check and risk assessment.
After being told that the police would be called if we refused to leave the park, we left but after discussing the events of the day later, felt that our removal from the park was unacceptable. We were not harassing people, merely offering them a leaflet, nor were we blocking access to the park. Furthermore, with reference to the issue that has since become the most contentious, we were nowhere near the children’s play area.
Significantly, when we attended the park just two days later to defy the purported ‘rules’ on such activity, we were able to spend over an hour in the park and handed out 200 leaflets. Not one member of staff approached us, despite our being far closer to the children’s play area than we had been before. We suspected that this may have been something to so with the presence of Shropshire Star journalists reporting on our activities but nevertheless, it seems that the rules of two days previous were not being as rigorously applied.
Earlier today, you issued an apology regarding the suggestion that adults without children would be stopped and quizzed in the park but this does not address the issue that members of our collective were asked to leave the park for undertaking peaceful activities in a public space. Indeed, our activities could not even be described as a demonstration, we were just standing in the park handing out leaflets on an issue that the Council claims to have placed high on its list of priorities.
At the time, Denis Allen was quoted as saying,
The Council will not make any apology for putting the welfare of young people first. The Council has a duty of care to the children and adult visitors to our parks in this instance and therefore, we need to know who the people are who are approaching park visitors, what they are doing and what they are distributing.
We fully appreciate the need to protect children and, indeed, every member of our community from unnecessary distress or harm, hence our concern on the issue of climate change. However, as stated above, we were not approaching or harassing park visitors, we were completely open with park staff about what we were doing and happily provided a copy of our leaflet for inspection. Some people did disagree with us on the issue of climate change but no-one expressed concern, irritation or distress about the fact that we were there. What’s more, on our way out of the park we met up with someone who had taken a leaflet and they were shocked and dismayed that we had been asked to leave.
Several correspondents to the local press and significantly, the Home Office, have made it clear that neither the Council nor their staff have the right to ask that anyone undergo a CRB check or risk assessment if they are not working with children or vulnerable adults. Telford & Wrekin Council have, therefore, clearly misrepresented and misused both the Police Act (1997) and the Protection of Children Act (1999) and whether this was intentional or not, it does not say much for the capabilities of a council that claims to be putting the welfare of young people first. If this were the case, surely council staff would have a better knowledge of the law in this regard.
Even a small amount of responsibly-minded research will show, child abuse (whether physical or sexual) is far more likely to be perpetrated by someone from within the child’s own family or at least, someone who is already known to the child. The mere suggestion that children can be protected from those rare individuals who abduct them from a public place, merely by asking lone adults what they are up to, is not only misguided but frankly, dangerous.
We therefore repeat the request made in our letter of 11 August that the Council provide a full public apology to those group members asked to leave the park, admit that they made a mistake and offer assurances that such spurious regulations will not be cited in the future.
It has been suggested to us that, as the park is supposed to be there for the use of all members of the community and not just those with children, some sort of ‘Speakers Corner’ area could be installed for the use of those who wish encourage public debate on issues of concern to them. However, we suspect that an organisation, which repeatedly refers to itself as the ‘landowner’ of the park and to those who use it as its ‘customers’ has little interest in such progressive ideas. Rather they seek to impose authoritarian rules and regulations to assert their authority over those to whom they are ultimately responsible as public servants.
We look forward to receiving your response by return and would advise that this letter and any responses will be made available for public viewing.
Yours sincerely
Rachel Whittaker
On behalf of Wrekin Stop War
 
You might not be surprised to know that Cllr Andrew Eade has not replied to the legitimate communication, nor has an apology been offered.
 
However, it is said that Cllr Andrew Eade is working on a response.
 
This is talk for, if we ignore it, it will all blow over and people will forget all about it.
 
Well, people have not forgotten all about it and it has been noted that NO member of Telford and Wrekin Council has been held to account for this local disgrace that soon became a national disgrace and because of their mishandling and cover ups brought considerable embarrassment on Telford and Wrekin.
 
But this is not enough for the industrious desk jockeys
 
 M a d e l e y G r e e n D a y ' 0 8

A truly family treat in Madeley Park

Sunday 5th October from 1.00pm - 4.00pm
 
The above event promises to a success and a lot of hard work has gone into it. As well as being a fun day for all, it will also raise the awareness of green Issues and naturally you would expect to find Climate Change Opinion Formers at the event.
 
Rachel Whittaker, who is well known and respected for raising the awareness of Climate Change in new and innovative ways had been invited to attend the event.
 
However,
 
In the latest twist and bully boy antics of Telford and Wrekin Council their invitation to attend has been
 
WITHDRAWN WITHOUT EXPLANATION BY TELFORD AND WREKIN COUNCIL
 
The Council know who this collective are, they know the contents of the leaflet they wish to distribute and have previously distributed, but in a weird twist say they do not know who they are.
 
This is another example of Active censorship and a 4 star Council that continues to flounder from one disaster to the next.
 
I now put it to you Councillor Andrew Eade,
 
Are you going to reply to this legitimate contact as outlined above?
 
Are you prepared to ensure that someone is to be held accountable for the issues surrounding Telford Town Park and the national embarrassment caused?
 
Are you finally prepared to lead and allow residents access to their fundamental right of free speech?
 
You have made promises you have failed to keep, now is time to actually deliver.
 
<< Start < Prev 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > End >>

Results 65 - 68 of 93